Literatura
Kontakt Forum RSS
Ginekologija
Brojni znanstvenici istražuju uzroke, a drugi nastoje pronaći brzu i učinkovitu pomoć za liječenje ginekoloških oboljenja. Većina njih usmjerena je na tjelesne smetnje, dok je manje učinjeno na razjašnjenju psiholoških mehanizama povezanih s ovim tegobama.

Literatura

Datum zadnje izmjene: 15. veljače 2013.
Kolposkopija

Nocon M, Mittendorf T, Roll S et al. Welche medizinischen und gesundheitsökonomischen Nutzen hat die Kolposkopie als primäres Screening auf das Zervixkarzinom? DIMDI GMS Health Technology Assessment 2007; Vol 3: 1-5, ISSN 1861-8863; http://portal.dimdi.de/de/hta/hta_berichte/hta198_bericht_de.pdf

Etherington IJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI et al. Observer variability among colposcopists from the West Midlands region. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104 (12): 1380-4

Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Zhang WH et al. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findinngs on the refferal Papanicolaou smear? J Reprod Med 2001; 46 (8): 724-8.

NHSCSP. Colposcopy and programme management. Guidelines. Publication No 20; May 2010.

Klasifikacija Rio der Janeiro; http://www.hdgo.hr/userFiles/upload/documents/aktualne-teme/kolposkopija/nomenclature7-11.pdf

Kolposkopski obrazac "Rio de Janeiro | Zagreb 2011"; http://www.hdgo.hr/Default.aspx?sifraStranica=523

Hopman EH, Voorhoorst FJ, Kenemans P et al. Observer agreeminet on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 58 (2): 206-9

McCord ML, Stovali TG, Summitt RL Jr, Ling FW. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary? Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77 (5): 715-9

Benedet JL, Anderson GH, Boyes DA. Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65 (4): 557-62

Liu WM, Chao KC, Wang KI, Ng HT. Colposcopic assessment in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih (Taipei) 1989; 43 (3): 171-6

Tidbury P, Singer A, Jenkins D. CIN3: the role of lesion size invasion. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 99: 583-6

Skehan M, Soutter WP, Lim K et al. Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsy. Br J Obstet Gyneaecol 1990; 97 (9): 811-6

Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Rollason M. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98 (12): 1273-6

Ang MS, Kaufman RH, Adam E et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone. Comparison of histologic findings. J Reprod Med 1995; 40 (3): 167-70

Sillman F, Boyce J, Fruchter R. The significance of atypical vessels and neovascularization in cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139 (2): 154-9

Cho HB, Kim JH. Treatment of the patiensts with abnormal cervical cytology: a „see-and-treat“ versus three-step strategy. J Gynecol Oncol 2009; 20 (3): 164-8

El-Sayed MM, Al-Daraji W, Finnegan C et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Active versus Conservative Colposcopic Management of Mild Dyskaryosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2009; 2:261-66.

Howells RE, O'Mahoney F, Tucker H et al. How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model. BJOG 2000; 107 (9): 1075-82

Hopman EH, Kenemans P, Helmerhorst TJ. Positive predictive rate of colposcopic examination of the cervix uteri: an overview of literature. Obstet Gyencol Surv 1998; 53 (2): 97-106

Skehan M, Soutter WP; Lim K et al. Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1990; 97 (9): 811-6

Parham DM, Wiredu EK, Hussein KA. The cytological prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in colposcopically directed biopsies. Cytopathology 1991; 2(6): 285-90

Liu WM, Chao KC, Wang KI, Ng HT. Colposcopic assessment in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih (Taipei) 1989; 43 (3): 171-6

Kierkegaard O, Byrjalswen C, Frandsen KH et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and colposcopy in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 738: 648-51

Jones MH, Jenkins D, Singer A. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dysdaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII. Cytopathology 1996; 7 (1): 17-24

Cinel A, Oselladore M, Insacco E, Minucci D. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 19909; 11(6): 433-7

Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Philippe E. An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76 (5): 468-73

Heatley MK, Bury J. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on ervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelail neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology 1998; 9(29: 93-9

Hopman EH, Voorhoorst FJ, Kenemans P et al. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 58 (29: 206-9

Literatura