Biopsija u ginekologiji. U: Šimunić V. Ginekologija.
Dodatne metode u patologiji. U: Ćorušić A, Babić D, Šamija M, Šobat H: Ginekološka onkologija.
Petra M. Casey, Margaret E. Long, Mary L. Marnach.
Abnormal Cervical Appearance: What to Do, When to Worry? Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 February; 86(2): 147–151. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0512
Steven M. Yellon, Alexandra E. Burns, Jennifer L. See et al.
Progesterone Withdrawal Promotes Remodeling Processes in the Nonpregnant Mouse Cervix. Biol Reprod. 2009 July; 81(1): 1–6. Published online 2009 February 18. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.074997
Nupur Gupta, Suneeta Mittal, Neena Lal et al.
A rare case of primary mesenteric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with metastasis to the cervix uteri. World J Surg Oncol. 2007; 5: 137. Published online 2007 November 29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-137
Julia Kravchenko, Igor Akushevich, Amy P. Abernethy, H. Kim Lyerly.
Evaluating the Number of Stages in Development of Squamous Cell and Adenocarcinomas across Cancer Sites Using Human Population-Based Cancer Modeling. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5): e37430. Published online 2012 May 22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037430
Mi-La Kim, Ho-Suap Hahn, Kyung-Taek Lim et al.
The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 March 31; 22(1): 25–31.
Jacqueline M Vink, Folkert J van Kemenade, Chris J L M Meijer et al.
Cervix smear abnormalities: linking pathology data in female twins, their mothers and sisters. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 January; 19(1): 108–111.
Rajan Duggal, Radhika Srinivasan.
Primary amelanotic melanoma of the cervix: case report with review of literature. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 September; 21(3): 199–202.
Jeong-Yeol Park, Jaeman Bae, Myong Cheol Lim et al.
Role of high risk-human papilloma virus test in the follow-up of patients who underwent conization of the cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009 June; 20(2): 86–90.
Ka Hyun Nam, Ja Young Kwon, Young-Han Kim, Yong-Won Park.
Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage
J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 December 30; 21(4): 225–229.
I Tsoumpou, M Arbyn, M Kyrgiou et al.
p16INK4a immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 May; 35(3): 210–220.
Mi-Young Shin, Eun-Sung Seo, Suk-Joo Choi et al.
The role of prophylactic cerclage in preventing preterm delivery after electrosurgical conization. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 December 30; 21(4): 230–236.
Gabriella Ferrandina, Vanda Salutari, Marco Petrillo et al.
Conservatively treated glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix. World J Surg Oncol. 2008; 6: 92.
Susanne Albrechtsen, Svein Rasmussen, Steinar Thoresen et al.
Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2008; 337: a1343.
John H Shepherd.
Challenging Dogma: Radical Conservation Surgery for Early Stage Cervical Cancer in Order to Retain Fertility. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 April; 91(3): 181–187. doi: 10.1308/003588409X392108
B. Folke Pettersson, Kristina Hellman, Roxane Vaziri et al.
Cervical cancer in the screening era: who fell victim in spite of successful screening programs? J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 June 30; 22(2): 76–82.
N Holst, T Abyholm.
Precancerous lesions of the cervix uteri in infertile women. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 October 8; 287(6398): 1019–1020.
Qian Li, Miriam R. Anver, Zhitao Li et al.
GalNAcα1-3Gal, a new prognostic marker for cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010 January 15; 126(2): 459–468. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24716
Stephan Braun, Daniel Reimer, Isolde Strobl et al.
Fatal invasive cervical cancer secondary to untreated cervical dysplasia: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2011; 5: 316.